because/for/that

[w***@kkcity.com.tw]

請問這三個字當成"因為"解釋的時候
是不是完全可以互換
想用哪一個就用哪一個阿?

像是中文的"因為" "由於"
雖然表達一樣的意思
但"由於"是比較正式的用法

所以想了解一下
這三個字是不是也有這種程度上的差別
感謝指教~
--
┌─────◆ＫＫＣＩＴＹ◆─────┐ ● KKCITY 市民小常識  ●
│ bbs.kkcity.com.tw │ Q:文章標題前有#符號是代表什麼意思?
└──《From:218.210.43.50 》──┘ A:被作者加密了，需輸入密碼才能閱讀
--

[Kasey Chang 小張]

Post by w***@kkcity.com.tw
請問這三個字當成"因為"解釋的時候
是不是完全可以互換
想用哪一個就用哪一個阿?

No

Post by w***@kkcity.com.tw
像是中文的"因為" "由於"
雖然表達一樣的意思
但"由於"是比較正式的用法
所以想了解一下
這三個字是不是也有這種程度上的差別
感謝指教~

No, for, and that, can only be used as a part of a phrase, almost like a
conjunction, whereas because can be used in a sentence by itself, assuming
a question was asked before.

Example:

"Why is he upset?"
"Because his sweetheart wrote him a 'Dear John' letter."

You can't substitute "for" or "that" in this situation.

In fact, you can probably FORGET about using the other two words as
subsitute for "because". I can't think of any situation where those
two words are MORE appropriate than because.

[w***@kkcity.com.tw]

Post by Kasey Chang 小張

Post by w***@kkcity.com.tw
請問這三個字當成"因為"解釋的時候
是不是完全可以互換
想用哪一個就用哪一個阿?

No

Post by w***@kkcity.com.tw
像是中文的"因為" "由於"
雖然表達一樣的意思
但"由於"是比較正式的用法
所以想了解一下
這三個字是不是也有這種程度上的差別
感謝指教~

No, for, and that, can only be used as a part of a phrase, almost like a
conjunction, whereas because can be used in a sentence by itself, assuming
a question was asked before.
"Why is he upset?"
"Because his sweetheart wrote him a 'Dear John' letter."
You can't substitute "for" or "that" in this situation.
In fact, you can probably FORGET about using the other two words as
subsitute for "because". I can't think of any situation where those
two words are MORE appropriate than because.

We are glad that we have accomplished another arduous task.
以這句來說
把that換成because後
不知道語氣上有沒有什麼差異呢?
感謝指教:)
--
┌─────◆ＫＫＣＩＴＹ◆─────┐    KKCITY 市民小密技 -文章標題上-  ◣
│ bbs.kkcity.com.tw │   Ctrl+y 可設定單篇文章加密
└──《From:218.210.43.50 》──┘ ◤  Shift+y 可設定單篇文章密碼
--

[Kasey Chang 小張]

Post by w***@kkcity.com.tw

Post by Kasey Chang 小張

Post by w***@kkcity.com.tw
請問這三個字當成"因為"解釋的時候
是不是完全可以互換
想用哪一個就用哪一個阿?

No

Post by w***@kkcity.com.tw
像是中文的"因為" "由於"
雖然表達一樣的意思
但"由於"是比較正式的用法
所以想了解一下
這三個字是不是也有這種程度上的差別
感謝指教~

No, for, and that, can only be used as a part of a phrase, almost like a
conjunction, whereas because can be used in a sentence by itself, assuming
a question was asked before.
"Why is he upset?"
"Because his sweetheart wrote him a 'Dear John' letter."
You can't substitute "for" or "that" in this situation.
In fact, you can probably FORGET about using the other two words as
subsitute for "because". I can't think of any situation where those
two words are MORE appropriate than because.

We are glad that we have accomplished another arduous task.
以這句來說
把that換成because後
不知道語氣上有沒有什麼差異呢?
感謝指教:)

Slight difference, and thanks for the example.

We are glad that we have...

is slightly more informal than

We are glad because we have...

The former sentence, both phrases feels as if they have almost equal
weight, whereas the latter simply explains WHY we're glad.

[㊣贛林老木老枝歪]

※ 引述《warep ( )》之銘言：

Post by w***@kkcity.com.tw
We are glad that we have accomplished another arduous task.
以這句來說
把that換成because後
不知道語氣上有沒有什麼差異呢?

換成because要加逗點。

"We are glad, because we have ..."

語氣當然有差異；你可以自己琢磨。
　
--
蒙帝派松正體中文計畫 (4/23) - 如何隱身 - SPAM - 英國殺人笑話
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/journeyman&article_id=14377810
▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
 ■法外科學暨工程顧問公司■  http://www.wretch.cc/blog/journeyman/
▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆
--
┌─────◆ＫＫＣＩＴＹ◆─────┐ ◢　◤ 找歌最方便 KKBOX 歌詞搜尋!!
│ bbs.kkcity.com.tw │ \^_^ /  ★http://www.kkbox.com.tw★
└──《From:59.115.200.163 》──┘ 　 ◤ 唱片公司授權，音樂盡情下載
--