Discussion:
請問句子結構與意思
(时间太久无法回复)
K***@kkcity.com.tw
2007-11-28 02:20:17 UTC
Permalink
There is no evidence that LPI's potential as that appears, get the same

help with resale(if any is need) adds value to investment contract; an

investor could, for all any one of the many firms that sell viatical

settlements.

LPI是一家公司的名字；viatical settlement是「保單貼現」。


我從evidence之後就看不懂了，因為我不了解誰是主詞誰是動詞，形容詞子句是在形容

哪一個名詞，好混亂。所以想請各位大大幫我分析句子結構，並且告知句子意思，

謝謝各位了！


--
┌─────◆ＫＫＣＩＴＹ◆─────┐ ■ KKBOX 可立刻 聽音樂 ■ 
│ bbs.kkcity.com.tw │  ■■所有想找的歌通通不必等 ■■ 
└──《From:218.165.131.183 》──┘ ■■■http://www.kkbox.com.tw■■■
--
㊣鉛色微風中 拔辣天空下
2007-11-28 04:08:14 UTC
Permalink
※ 引述《Koighi ( )》之銘言：

There is no evidence that LPI's potential as that appears, get the same
help with resale (if any is need) adds value to investment contract; an
investor could (get help with resale), for all any one of the many firms
that sell viatical settlements.
Post by K***@kkcity.com.tw
我從evidence之後就看不懂了，因為我不了解誰是主詞誰是動詞，形容詞子句是在形容
哪一個名詞，好混亂。
以上藍色的部份可以視為插句，紫色是省略的部份。
拿掉插句、還原省略的部份，就變成

There is no evidence that LPI's potential adds value to investment
contract; an investor could get help with resale, for all any one
of the many firms that sell viatical settlements.

這是我的理解，你看看會不會比較好懂。
　
--
X-URL1: http://www.aviationnow.com/ ‧李登輝＝格達費＝外星人‧有廁
  檢舉匪諜 人人有責 ⊙ 檢舉匪諜 安居樂業 人所
  檢舉匪諜滲透破壞 人人安居樂業｜肅清貪污經濟犯罪 社會繁榮進步  　 
  破案獎金三百萬｜知情不報判徒刑  
  檢舉要件：請用真實姓名、地址，受理機關絕對保密  
X-Disclaimer: 李登輝一定是外星人！ Mk.22 Mod4 5/15/01 Mod3 6/9/98
--
┌─────◆ＫＫＣＩＴＹ◆─────┐ ◢　◤ 動態歌詞 讓你成為Ｋ歌之王!
│ bbs.kkcity.com.tw │ \^_^ /  ★ http://www.kkbox.com.tw ★
└──《From:59.115.205.3 》──┘ 　 ◤ 唱片公司授權，音樂盡情下載
--
K***@kkcity.com.tw
2007-11-29 00:23:14 UTC
Permalink
※ 引述《journeyman (㊣鉛色微風中 拔辣天空下)》之銘言：
Post by ㊣鉛色微風中 拔辣天空下
※ 引述《Koighi ( )》之銘言：
There is no evidence that LPI's potential as that appears, get the same
help with resale (if any is need) adds value to investment contract; an
investor could (get help with resale), for all any one of the many firms
that sell viatical settlements.
Post by K***@kkcity.com.tw
我從evidence之後就看不懂了，因為我不了解誰是主詞誰是動詞，形容詞子句是在形容
哪一個名詞，好混亂。
以上藍色的部份可以視為插句，紫色是省略的部份。
拿掉插句、還原省略的部份，就變成
There is no evidence that LPI's potential adds value to investment
contract; an investor could get help with resale, for all any one
of the many firms that sell viatical settlements.
這是我的理解，你看看會不會比較好懂。
　
journeyman，謝謝你的解答，不過我想要請問一下

藍色插句中that appears的「that」是「LPI's potential」嗎？「get」的主詞是誰

呢？

--
┌─────◆ＫＫＣＩＴＹ◆─────┐▇─┐ＫＫＡＤＳＬ→六星級優質連線服務
│ bbs.kkcity.com.tw │┴ └─▇ 馬上申請帶你上網環遊全世界！
└──《From:218.165.131.183 》──┘ KKADSL ┴  http://adsl.kkcity.com.tw 
--
㊣鉛色微風中 拔辣天空下
2007-11-29 03:24:35 UTC
Permalink
※ 引述《Koighi ( )》之銘言：
Post by K***@kkcity.com.tw
※ 引述《journeyman (㊣鉛色微風中 拔辣天空下)》之銘言：
Post by ㊣鉛色微風中 拔辣天空下
There is no evidence that LPI's potential as that appears, get the same
help with resale (if any is need) adds value to investment contract; an
investor could (get help with resale), for all any one of the many firms
that sell viatical settlements.
journeyman，謝謝你的解答，不過我想要請問一下
藍色插句中that appears的「that」是「LPI's potential」嗎？「get」的主詞是誰
呢？
that大概可理解為LPI's potential吧，
get the same help with resale怎麼看都有問題，改為getting還比較正常點。

就我看，這一句的文法有很大的問題
雜誌之類的文章就算了
如果這是考試題目，那還真是點點點
　
--
X-URL1: http://www.aviationnow.com/ ‧李登輝＝格達費＝外星人‧有廁
  檢舉匪諜 人人有責 ⊙ 檢舉匪諜 安居樂業 人所
  檢舉匪諜滲透破壞 人人安居樂業｜肅清貪污經濟犯罪 社會繁榮進步  　 
  破案獎金三百萬｜知情不報判徒刑  
  檢舉要件：請用真實姓名、地址，受理機關絕對保密  
X-Disclaimer: 李登輝一定是外星人！ Mk.22 Mod4 5/15/01 Mod3 6/9/98
--
┌─────◆ＫＫＣＩＴＹ◆─────┐    KKCITY 市民小密技 -文章標題上-  ◣
│ bbs.kkcity.com.tw │   Ctrl+y 可設定單篇文章加密
└──《From:59.115.203.253 》──┘ ◤  Shift+y 可設定單篇文章密碼
--

Loading...